Wednesday, March 30, 2011

The Job At Hand


 

Statement from the Governor's Office on Mural Relocation

Monday, March 28, 2011 at 10:58am
Mural Statement

March 28, 2011

Governor's Office

"The mural has been removed and is in storage awaiting relocation to a more appropriate venue. Workers and employers need to work together to create opportunity for Maine's 50,000 unemployed. We understand that not everyone agrees with this decision, but the Maine Department of Labor has to be focused on the job at hand."

Adrienne Bennett, Press Secretary to Governor Paul LePage

Every voter in the state of Maine is aware that Governor LePage relied heavily on his Franco-American Heritage in the last election. Those who voted for him and the majority who did not also must know that he got where he is through hard work, by battling adversity, and a heavy dose of self reliance. We all also realize that Governor LePage is strongly anti-union and anti-labor. That is how he interprets his "pro-business" stance. It is on this point, however, that a strong dissonance between the Governor's heritage and his economic position comes into focus, for among the historic landmarks depicted on those murals were scenes of the great shoe strike of 1937.

When the CIO organized the mill workers of Massachusetts, the mill owners moved operations to more "business friendly" Maine, which had a large and growing untapped and unskilled workforce heavily endowed with Canadian French who had fled here from the depleted soil of Quebec, answering mill owner ads for workers; men, women, boys and girls.

Down into the mills they went, working very long hours for very little pay; much less pay and much longer hours that their unionized brethren in Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Connecticut.

The CIO tried to organize in Lewiston/Auburn but found the going extremely difficult. Workers had been forced to sign "yellow dog contracts' that made it a dismissible offense to unionize. When the federal government passed the Wagner Act that guaranteed the worker's a right to unionize, collectively bargain and to strike, all hell broke loose. For the next 95 days workers, most of French Canadian lineage, were punched, stoned, clubbed, tear gassed and locked out of the mills. In the end the mill owners formed their own company union for the workers, LASPA.

Things quieted down. Some workers were allowed back into the mills at slightly better wages and conditions granted by the mill owners out of fear of the CIO. However, in the collective memory of the Androscoggin Valley Franco American community, they had been beaten, beaten by the collective of "business friendly" greed, money and power.

We have come a long way in this state and nation since the Androscoggin violence of 1937, but our gains are now in jeopardy. A sign has been hung at the entrances to Maine declaring it to be "Open for Business". Well funded anti union movements are gaining momentum. Art work depicting our people's labor history has been ordered removed and hidden. Mill owners and other large businesses are reaping large and larger tax breaks paid for by workers and retirees while needed services to the payers are being taken away or seriously curtailed.

Governor LePage, if carrying these policies forward is what you meant by, the Maine Department of Labor has to be focused on the job at hand", have you no shame?

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

signs of the times

”In the evening you say ‘It will be fine; there is a red sky’, and in the morning, ‘Stormy weather today; the sky is red and overcast’. You know how to read the face of the sky, but you cannot read the signs of the times”. (Matthew 16: 2-3 the Jerusalem Bible)

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying the cross." -- Sinclair Lewis

Our history as a people and as a nation has passed through many portals; from agrarian to industrial to corporate business. During these passages we have often been shaken, threatened and frightened, but the voyage, for the most part, has also been exciting and ennobling. 

In his Farewell Address to the Nation on January 17, 1961 President Dwight David Eisenhower told us that we had passed through a doorway and into a new, bright, but frightening era:

“A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction...
This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence — economic, political, even spiritual — is felt in every city, every statehouse, and every office of the federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society. In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals so that security and liberty may prosper together.”

It might be said that the military-industrial complex has morphed into the business complex with its trans-national corporations dictating the need, size and policy of the military as well as the policies and purpose of our government itself. Indeed, some fear that our American democracy is in danger of being co-opted, adulterated, and poisoned by the rapidly growing influences of big money and big business. Of course our wealthy citizens need to have their voice heard as do the corporations they form. But when their voice drowns out all others, when what is in their private interests displaces the needs of the vast majority, when the business of our democratic government is set and determined only by business, when the “iron triangle” replaces humanism and the military-industrial complex rules us all, that voice has become over-amplified and dangerous.

President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, in a 1938 message to Congress stated, “The first truth is that the liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is fascism - ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power.”

Today we are witness to a proliferation of demagogues pointing to what they perceive as our national decay and offering redemption through purity and unity if we just abandon some of our democratic liberties and remove all restraining law and regulation from their path to financial fulfillment.
 These demagogues would not be troublesome if not for the fact that so many of our people are listening, believing and, actively as well as passively, collaborating.

During the Cold War, like many Americans, I bristled (to put it mildly) whenever anyone referred to an American as a fascist. But today, in the face of what has and is transpiring in Wisconsin, Maine, Florida and other states, I have forced myself to look into why anyone would refer to us in this manner.

The Communist Third International published the following definition of fascism:
“Fascism in power is the open, terroristic dictatorship of the most reactionary, the most chauvinistic, the most imperialistic elements of finance capitalism.”

And

“The historic function of fascism is to smash the working class, destroy its organizations, and stifle political liberties when the capitalists find themselves unable to govern and dominate with the help of democratic machinery.”

It has been pointed out that a true Marxist would not label the United States or any elected government “fascist” since they came into being without the backing of a “street movement”. However, The Encyclopedia of Marxism goes beyond definitions and gives nine fundamental and disturbingly recognizable characteristics of fascism:

Right Wing: Fascists are fervently against: Marxism, Socialism, Anarchism, Communism, Environmentalism; etc – in essence, they are against the progressive left in total, including moderate lefts (social democrats, etc). Fascism is an extreme right wing ideology, though it can be opportunistic.

Nationalism: Fascism places a very strong emphasis on patriotism and nationalism. Criticism of the nation's main ideals, especially war, is lambasted as unpatriotic at best and treason at worst. State propaganda consistently broadcasts threats of attack, while justifying pre-emptive war. Fascism invariably seeks to instill in its people the warrior mentality: to always be vigilant, wary of strangers and suspicious of foreigners.

Anti-equality: Fascism loathes the principles of economic equality and disdains equality between immigrant and citizen. Some forms of fascism extend the fight against equality into other areas: gender, sexual, minority or religious rights, for example.

Religious: Fascism contains a strong amount of reactionary religious beliefs, harking back to times when religion was strict, potent, and pure. Nearly all Fascist societies are Christian, and are supported by Catholic and Protestant churches.

Capitalist: Fascism does not require revolution to exist in capitalist society: fascists can be elected into office (though their disdain for elections usually means manipulation of the electoral system). They view parliamentary and congressional systems of government to be inefficient and weak, and will do their best to minimize its power over their policy agenda. Fascism exhibits the worst kind of capitalism where corporate power is absolute and all vestiges of workers' rights are destroyed.

War: Fascism is capitalism at the stage of impotent imperialism. War can create markets that would not otherwise exist by wreaking massive devastation on a society, which then requires reconstruction! Fascism can thus "liberate" the survivors, provide huge loans to that society so fascist corporations can begin the process of rebuilding.

Voluntarist Ideology: Fascism adopts a certain kind of “voluntarism;” they believe that an act of will, if sufficiently powerful, can make something true. Thus all sorts of ideas about racial inferiority, historical destiny, even physical science, are supported by means of violence, in the belief that they can be made true. It is this sense that Fascism is subjectivist.

Anti-Modern: Fascism loathes all kinds of modernism, especially creativity in the arts, whether acting as a mirror for life (where it does not conform to the Fascist ideal), or expressing deviant or innovative points of view. Fascism invariably burns books and victimizes artists, and artists who do not promote the fascists ideals are seen as “decadent.” Fascism is hostile to broad learning and interest in other cultures, since such pursuits threaten the dominance of fascist myths. The peddling of conspiracy theories is usually substituted for the objective study of history.

Between my research-- which was forced upon me by curiosity and current events-- and the current events themselves, I find myself in a very uncomfortable environment. Whereas I do not want to believe we Americans are fascist, I cannot help but believe we are dangerously leaning in that direction. 

Winston Churchill once said, “Democracy is a very bad form of government. Unfortunately all the others are so much worse.”

 It is my prayerful hope that we will honor and protect our form of democracy from all enemies, foreign and domestic. To paraphrase President Eisenhower, We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of security and liberty so that they might prosper together.

Thursday, March 10, 2011

The Cost of Indifference

During these days of escalating social and political change, I received the following note from someone I highly respect. I pass it on because it is simply damned important to remember.

If we learn nothing else from the study of world history, we should at least remember the following:

1.More despotic states have come into existence through a gradual elective process than through violent upheaval.

2. Virtually all totalitarian governments, regardless of the philosophy upon which they are based (fascism, communism, theism, etc.) have shared one element essential to their continued existence: the absence or elimination of an independent judicial system.

When discussing some of the most oppressive and evil regimes of history, we often hear such comments as "How could it happen?" or "It couldn't happen here." Several of history's most brutal dictators have left behind instructions as to "how": start with a largely apathetic and unthinking populace, motivate the disaffected by telling them who is to blame for their woes, and offer them a solution, usually at the expense of those to blame. Gradually usurp greater powers while also gradually restricting freedoms, always in the cause of protecting the people or the state. Bake slowly over several years or more, and where once there was a constitutional government you now have a dictatorship.

Of course, thank God, it can't happen here…..

There is an old election adage about getting the government we deserve. How very true, but I prefer the version from Plato: "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men."

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Just In Case

Just in case my previous post entitled "On Claiming Reagan" shows Mr. Reagan in too warm a light, let me share with you a further recollection of our former president given by Lynn Parramore in Salon, which originally appeared at New Deal 2.0 She writes:
War Room
Wednesday, Feb 23, 2011 15:01 ET

"Reagan’s history is better known -- or so you would think. His firing of 13,000 striking workers was, as Washington Post columnist Harold Meyerson put it, "an unambiguous signal that employers need feel little or no obligation to their workers." After Reagan, employers were emboldened to illegally ditch workers who sought to unionize, replace permanent employees who could collect benefits with temps, and ship factories and jobs abroad. Ever-smiling with his friendly cowboy image, Reagan tried to lower the minimum wage for younger workers, weaken child labor, job safety and anti-sweatshop laws, and do away with training programs for the jobless. He also did his best to replace thousands of federal employees with temps without civil service or union protections. Under his watch, the share of the nation’s wealth held by the richest 1 percent of Americans went up 5 percent richer. Guess whose declined?"
http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/02/23/parramore_union_shlaes